How Much Is Enough to Retire in Japan?

May 2024 · 10 minute read

Listen to and/or watch the “Read My Lips Podcast Series” version.

What’s new:  The results of a large-scale survey in Japan of people in their 60s have just been released, and the findings shed light on perceptions of whether the conventional wisdom that one needs 20 million yen ($134,120) to retire comfortably is actually accurate.    "Voices of 6,000 People in Their 60s" (60代6000人の声), a survey conducted by the Finwell Institute, LLC among people in their 60s who are either nearing retirement or have recently retired and live in Japan's largest cities, covered a variety of topics with a particular focus on financial security.

Context:  Just as William Bengen's famous "Four Percent Rule" has been the de facto burn rate for retirees in the West for more than a quarter of a century and continues to occupy an outsized share of the minds of retirees and prospective retirees, the media in Japan has focused on a specific dollar (or, more accurately, yen) figure for those who want to calculate a "safe" withdrawal rate and those who aspire to FIRE.  In 2019, the Financial Services Agency published a controversial report suggesting that the "magic number" needed to ensure a comfortable retirement was 20 million yen ($134,120) on top of the state pension.  The backlash was almost immediate, and the working group behind the original research effectively withdrew the report.  The media, however, continued to fixate on this calculation, and it has stuck in the collective psyche ever since.  This incident became known in Japan as the "20 million yen for retirement problem," which is referred to as the rogo ni sen man en mondai (老後2000万円問題) in Japanese.

As it has been almost 5 years since the report was published, the debate over whether the 20 million yen figure is indeed an appropriate target for a nest egg has died down to some extent, but with the recent rise in inflation after more than two decades of deflation and repeated price increases for goods and services over the past 12 months, many Japanese are concerned about the cost of living in old age.

Why it matters:  Longevity risk is not a theoretical exercise in Japan.  Developing an accurate estimate of the amount of money one will need to live comfortably in retirement is relevant everywhere, especially in the context of what is known in Japan as "the age of living to 100," or jinsei hyakunen jidai (人生100年時代).  One of the most widely quoted financial planning experts, Laurence Kotlikoff, a professor of economics at Boston University and a New York Times bestselling author, has long advocated the merits of building personal financial plans to age 100, despite the fact that only about 2% of Americans are likely to live that long.  In Japan, however, centenarians are much more common, currently accounting for more than 5% of the population.  According to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 25% of Japanese women born in 2022 are expected to live to age 95.

By the numbers:  The extensive survey produced many relevant facts and figures.

How much is thought to be enough:  A relatively large number of respondents or 26.8% said "20 million yen is not enough" for retirement.  14.8% thought that "about 20 million yen is necessary," and 12.1% said "20 million yen is not even necessary.”

Curiously, the majority of respondents who said "I don't think 20 million yen is enough" were those with the most assets.  This response came from people who had accumulated an average of just over 36 million yen ($244,000).

How much is really enough:  The author of the study calculated that 168 million yen ($1.13 million) is really how much one should accumulate for a comfortable retirement. This number is more than 8 times higher than the figure touted by the media. Let's see what's behind this logic.

What’s next:  At the very least, retirees need to be aware of their own long-term calculations and come up with a realistic plan to supplement any shortfalls with asset income while managing expenses.  A few tweaks to income and/or expenses can have a significant positive effect over such a long period.

For example, deferring public pension benefits for 5 years would increase annual benefits by 42%.  Thus, the total benefits from age 70 to 100 would be 106.5 million yen ($715,000) (= 2.5 million yen x 1.42 x 30 years). In that case the required asset income would be reduced to only 31.5 million yen ($211,300).

Furthermore, if one were to live a slightly more frugal lifestyle and reduce living expenses from 60% of annual income during one’s final working years to only 55%, total living expenses over 35 years can be reduced by 14 million yen ($94,000) (= 8 million yen x 55% x 35 years - 168 million yen).  In such a case, the required amount of asset income would be only 17.5 million yen ($117,400), which seems much more reasonable given the 35-year time horizon.

In addition, it is possible for those who are enrolled in the National Pension Insurance program and those who are enrolled in their retired employer's Employees' Pension Insurance scheme under the age of 65 (voluntary enrollees) to increase the amount of the basic old-age pension they will receive in the future by adding a monthly premium of 400 yen ($2.72) to the National Pension Insurance premiums. While this may not sound like much, over time it can have a significant impact on the size of the investment gains.

Furthermore, the Japanese government has developed two long-term, tax-advantaged investment vehicles that can be used to build a nest egg over time.

Leave a comment

Links to Japanese Sources: https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/682995, https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/690722, https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/699870, and https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/710602.

#WilliamBengen #FourPercentRule #4%Rule #BengenRule #retirementincome #NISA #iDeCo #retiree #retirement #人生100年時代 #老後2000万円問題 #60代6000人の声 #超高齢社会 #少額投資非課税制度 #個人型確定拠出年金 #退職者 #退職

ncG1vNJzZmiqlZa5qK3Io6CnZqOqr7TAwJyiZ5ufonyxe8eormalpZi1brXSZpynp6WctW7AzmapnqyZp7Jutc1moZqokaM%3D